Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Checking relevance for Raj Deo Sharma VS State Of Bihar...
Checking relevance for High Court Bar Association, Allahabad VS State of U. P. ...
2024 2 Supreme 651 : Constitutional Courts should not normally fix a time-bound schedule for disposal of cases pending in any Court. The pattern of pendency of various categories of cases pending in every Court, including High Courts, is different. The situation at the grassroots level is better known to Judges of concerned Courts. Therefore, the issue of giving out-of-turn priority to certain cases should be best left to concerned Courts. Orders fixing outer limit for disposal of cases should be passed only in exceptional circumstances to meet extraordinary situations. This principle applies to both civil and criminal cases before trial courts. Directions that provide for automatic vacation of order of stay and disposal of all cases in which stay has been granted on a day-to-day basis virtually amount to judicial legislation, which the judiciary cannot exercise. Only the legislature can provide that cases of a particular category should be decided within a specific time. Even if such provisions exist, they are usually held to be directory, not mandatory.Checking relevance for SUDARSHANACHARAYA VS SHRI PURUSHOTTAMACHARYA...
2012 8 Supreme 748 : The court held that it is not open to a court to prescribe a time limit for the disposal of a case and direct that, after the expiration of that period, if the case does not get over, the accused should be acquitted or discharged. However, the court may direct the trial court to take up the case for final disposal and dispose of it within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the order, without making the acquittal or discharge automatic upon failure to meet the deadline.Checking relevance for Triveniben: Harbhajan Singh: Lal Singh: Indian Council Of Family And Social Welfare: Gurcharan Singh And Pritam Singh Rep. By Their Mother VS State Of Gujarat: State Of J & K: Union Of India: State Of T. N. : State Of Punjab...
Checking relevance for Yashpal Jain VS Sushila Devi...
2024 3 Supreme 214 : The judgment directs that trial courts shall fix the date of trial in consultation with advocates appearing for the parties to enable them to adjust their calendars, and once the date is fixed, trial should proceed on a day-to-day basis to the extent possible. Additionally, the court mandates that after pleadings are complete, parties should be called upon to appear on the day fixed as indicated in Order X of the CPC, and the court shall direct parties to opt for either mode of settlement outside court as specified in Section 89 of the CPC. In the event of ADR not being fruitful, trial would commence on the next day fixed and would proceed on a day-to-day basis. The judgment also emphasizes that trial judges should maintain a diary to ensure only a manageable number of cases are handled per day to avoid overcrowding and adjournments, and that the trial must be continued from day to day until all witnesses in attendance have been examined, unless exceptional reasons are recorded in writing for adjournment beyond the following day.Checking relevance for Neethu Jagdish VS Manumohan Mani...
Neethu Jagdish VS Manumohan Mani - Current Civil Cases (2023)
: Family Court has to pass an order in an interlocutory application ordering early hearing or time-bound disposal of a case, specifying a time limit in that order, when the applicant has stated a justifiable or valid reason for early hearing or time-bound disposal. The court is directed to dispose of the divorce petition as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of production of the certified copy of the judgment.Checking relevance for Surya Food And Agro Limited VS Om Traders...2023 0 Supreme(Del) 314 : Under Order XV-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as applicable to commercial disputes, the Court shall ensure that the arguments are closed not later than six months from the date of the first Case Management Hearing. This establishes a time limit for the disposal of the case before the trial court, ensuring efficient and timely disposal of commercial suits.
