Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Family Court’s Authority to Strike Off Defence - The Supreme Court in Mukesh Jain (Criminal Appeal Nos.1129-1130/2019, judgment dated 24.07.2019) held that a Family Court can strike off the defence of a respondent if there is nonpayment of interim maintenance in accordance with court orders. However, this power is discretionary and should be exercised with care and caution because it is a drastic measure and should be a last resort ["2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 1038"], ["04054040"].
Limitations on Court’s Power - Several rulings (e.g., Mahesh, Muraleedharan, Jincy) clarify that courts do not have the inherent power to completely dismiss or strike off the defence solely for nonpayment of interim maintenance, especially under Section 125 of the CrPC or Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Instead, the remedy for nonpayment is typically to execute the maintenance order via appropriate proceedings under Section 128 or similar mechanisms ["2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 1038"], ["2022 0 Supreme(MP) 282"].
Legal Position and Caution - Courts are advised to exercise restraint in striking off a defence, recognizing it as a drastic action that should be reserved for exceptional cases where wilful disobedience or default is evident. The power is considered directory, not mandatory, and should not be exercised lightly ["2025 0 Supreme(Kar) 93"], ["2023 0 Supreme(All) 556"].
Enforcement and Court’s Discretion - In cases where the husband wilfully disobeys court orders (e.g., nonpayment of interim maintenance), courts may strike off the defence or forfeit the right to contest, especially when NBWs are issued and remain unrecallable. Nonetheless, courts emphasize that such actions are not automatic and require judicial prudence ["2024 0 Supreme(AP) 478"], ["2024 0 Supreme(AP) 674"].
Summary and Conclusion - The current legal stance is that striking off a defence due to nonpayment of interim maintenance is permissible but should be done cautiously and only after considering the circumstances. The remedy for nonpayment primarily involves enforcement proceedings rather than outright dismissal of the defence. Courts are advised to exercise restraint and prefer enforcement over drastic measures ["2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 1038"], ["2022 0 Supreme(MP) 282"], ["2025 0 Supreme(Kar) 93"].
References:- Mukesh Jain, Supreme Court (2019) ["2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 1038"], ["04054040"]- Mahesh, Muraleedharan, and Jincy judgments ["2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 1038"]- Various High Court and Family Court rulings on enforcement and defence striking ["2022 0 Supreme(MP) 282"], ["2024 0 Supreme(AP) 478"], ["2024 0 Supreme(AP) 674"]- Summary of legal principles on exercise of court’s power to strike defence in maintenance cases.
In family law disputes, particularly those involving maintenance claims under , non-payment of can lead to severe consequences for the defaulting party. One contentious issue is whether courts can strike off the defence of the non-paying spouse or party. This drastic step raises questions about fairness, , and procedural safeguards. If you're dealing with such a situation, understanding the latest rulings is crucial.
The legal question at the heart of this matter is: Latest Rulings with Regard to Strike of Defence Due to Nonpayment of . Recent judgments from Indian courts, including and references to precedents, provide clarity on when and how this power may be exercised.
Under Section 125 Cr.P.C., courts can grant to ensure financial support for dependents during proceedings. Non-compliance with these orders doesn't automatically lead to . Courts approach this power cautiously, viewing it as a 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 971.
The consensus from recent cases is that striking off defence should only occur in cases of . For instance, in M.C. No.142/2021, the court stressed the need for due care before taking such an action 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 971. This aligns with broader principles under the , where under Section 151 allow similar measures but demand judicious application 2022 0 Supreme(Ker) 355 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 844.
Courts repeatedly emphasize that striking off defence is not the first response to non-payment. It must follow repeated opportunities for compliance. In the aforementioned M.C. No.142/2021, the order striking off defence was set aside, with directions for the petitioner to deposit arrears within 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 971.
Analogous principles appear in rent recovery cases under . The has held: It is not obligatory for the court in every case to strike off defence only because there is delay in deposit of the arrears of rent. The court has discretion in the matter and the power to strike off the defence is to be exercised with due regard to the facts and circumstances of each case 2003 7 Supreme 1. This discretion extends to maintenance scenarios, preventing mechanical application of the power 2022 0 Supreme(UK) 316.
Before any drastic step, the defaulting party must receive a fair chance to pay arrears. Failure to provide this opportunity renders the order vulnerable to challenge. Courts often direct deposit of dues and schedule hearings post-compliance 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 971.
In a related matrimonial context under the , non-payment of under was deemed insufficient grounds to strike off or dismiss a divorce petition, as proceedings differ from maintenance enforcement 2013 0 Supreme(Mad) 1034. This underscores that alternative remedies, like execution or , should be prioritized.
The in affirmed courts' under to strike off defence for deliberate non-compliance but cautioned against hasty use 2022 0 Supreme(Ker) 355 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 844. is pivotal, requiring assessment of case-specific factors like financial capacity and intent.
rulings reinforce this: defence cannot be struck off merely for non-payment; opportunities for compliance must be given 2017 0 Supreme(MP) 984 2016 0 Supreme(Ker) 533.
Not all courts agree on ' authority. Punjab & Haryana and Kerala opine that lack power to strike off defence for non-payment, favoring enforcement via recovery or 2017 0 Supreme(MP) 984 2016 0 Supreme(Ker) 533.
This divergence highlights the need for case-by-case evaluation. In rent disputes, revisional courts cannot interfere if trial courts lawfully exercise discretion by accepting late deposits 2022 0 Supreme(UK) 316 2003 7 Supreme 1.
While focused on maintenance, parallels from other domains strengthen these principles. In tenancy matters, courts reject striking off claims as premature without fulfilling conditions, emphasizing contractual clarity
. Similarly, arbitration awards uphold rejections of escalation claims for non-payment of interim bills, bound by contract terms 2012 0 Supreme(Del) 835.
In execution contexts, independent remedies like petitions for arrears prevail over striking off defence 2011 0 Supreme(Del) 290. These cases collectively affirm: courts prioritize equity, discretion, and alternatives to punitive measures.
Legal practitioners should advise clients on these nuances, preparing motions with supporting case law.
The latest rulings paint a balanced picture: while courts can strike off defence for non-payment of , they do so sparingly, prioritizing fairness and compliance opportunities. This protects respondents from undue prejudice while upholding maintenance orders.
Key Takeaways:- Treat striking off as a after wilful default.- Leverage with case-specific evidence.- Explore enforcement alternatives first.
This article provides general insights based on reported judgments and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your specific situation. Laws and interpretations may evolve.
(Word count: approximately 1050)
#FamilyLawIndia #MaintenanceRulings #StrikeOffDefence
Mukesh Jain ((Criminal Appeal Nos.1129-1130/2019) decided vide judgment dated 24.07.2019), the Supreme Court allowed a Family Court to strike off the defence of the respondent, in case of nonpayment of maintenance in accordance with the interim order passed. ... Mahesh, and Muraleedharan (supra) has held that the Family Court has no power to strike off the defence in an application under....
Thomas and held that the Magistrate does not possess the power to strike of the defence for failure to pay interim maintenance. Discussion and Directions on Enforcement of Orders of Maintenance 125. ... Mukesh Jain, the Supreme Court allowed a Family Court to strike of the defence of the respondent, in case of non-payment of maintenance in accordance with the interim order passed. ....
because of default in payment of the due amount of rent/arrears have been construed liberally; and the expression “may” in regard to the power of the Court to strike out defence has been construed as directory and not mandatory. ... If a party to a proceedings before the court has wilfully disobeyed the orders of the court, the court can strike off the defence. ... The next question is, ....
Mukesh Jain (5), the Supreme Court allowed a Family Court to strike off the defence of the respondent, in case of non-payment of maintenance in accordance with the interim order passed. xxx xxx xxx 130. ... (supra) , Mahesh(supra) , and Muraleedharan1 has held that the Family Court has no power to strike off the defence in an application under Section 125 on the failure of the husband to pay int....
It was on 11.02.2021, the learned Family Judge recorded that husband’s right to contest the matter was forfeited due to his failure to pay interim maintenance to his wife and children. ... For non-payment of interim maintenance, NBW was issued and the petitioner never moved an application for recall of it. Defence was struck off for failure to pay interim maintenance. There are no errors in the impugned o....
It was on 11.02.2021, the learned Family Judge recorded that husband’s right to contest the matter was forfeited due to his failure to pay interim maintenance to his wife and children. ... For non-payment of interim maintenance, NBW was issued and the petitioner never moved an application for recall of it. Defence was struck off for failure to pay interim maintenance. There are no errors in the impugned o....
Cause Papers [2] The cause papers are as follows:- (a) Plaintiff's Writ and Statement of Claim dated on the 13th of December 2019; (b) The Defendant's Statement of Defence dated on 17th of January 2020; (c) Plaintiff's Reply to Defence dated on ... [27] In response, the Defendant submitted that the Plaintiff has conveniently left out the words "latest to occur" before the said three conditions, which means that the "rental commencement da....
because of default in payment of the due amount of rent/arrears have been construed liberally; and the expression ‘may’ in regard to the power of the Court to strike out defence has been construed as directory and not mandatory. ... Thus, it can be seen that power to strike off defence is not to be exercised by treating it to be a statutory mandate. ... On 10.12.2021, plaintiff-responden....
We grant the motion of Appellee DAS Corporation (“DAS”) to summarily affirm the district court’s decision, which correctly recognized that the latest relief sought by Optional was directly contrary to our prior rulings in this case. ... Accordingly, we held that any attempt to bind DAS to the results of that trial would “raise[] serious due process OPTIONAL CAPITAL, INC. V. ... (“Optional”) is the latest chapter ....
The MSEDCL disconnected the electric supply on 31.1.2020 on nonpayment of the electricity bills, as the petitioner / builder did not pay the bills. ... Further, the learned advocate referred to rulings from the Hon'ble National Commission, Hon'ble Supreme Court, and Hon'ble Bombay High Court as under. ... Further as per the latest notification Dt.08/03/2019 on para 10.3 and 14 the transition policy has been explained in detail. The learned....
The last submission made on behalf of the tenants has also great force that since the trial court had exercised its jurisdiction lawfully by refusing to strike off defence and accepting the deposit of arrears of rent, the High Court could not justifiably interfere with the same in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 of the Code.” The court has discretion in the matter and the power to strike off the defence is to be exercised with due regard to the facts and cir....
Let me now consider the judgments relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner one after the other. It is needless to point out that the grounds upon which divorce is sought for are different from the grounds, upon which judicial separation was sought for under the provisions of the Hindu Marriages Act. Thus, in my considered opinion, nonpayment of arrears of interim alimony as ordered under Section 24 of the Act, cannot be a ground either to strike off or dismiss altogether....
The learned Arbitrator rightly concluded that the parties were bound by the contractual terms and conditions and accordingly, rejected this claim. 26. Claim Nos. 6 and 6 (a) were for escalation amount due to nonpayment of interim bills. The learned Arbitrator referred to Clause 6 of the letter inviting tenders and Clause 4 of the FTC which make it clear that other than the rates and amount mentioned in the bill of quantities (BOQ), the claimant would have no right to claim an....
It also cannot be lost sight of the fact that the appellant took independent remedy by filing an execution petition on account of the failure of the respondent to pay the arrears of the maintenance amount granted in her favour by the civil court in Section 18 proceedings. The Argument of learned counsel for the appellant that the learned Trial Court ought to have strike off the defence of the respondent due to the nonpayment of the amount of interim maintenance will thus not sustain ....
This Court has held that it is not obligatory for the court in every case to strike off defence only because there is delay in deposit of the arrears of rent. The court has discretion in the matter and the power to strike off the defence is to be exercised with due regard to the facts and circumstances of each case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
