Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Criminal Prosecution under Section 276CC - The Supreme Court has consistently held that criminal proceedings under Section 276CC of the Income Tax Act can be initiated and continued irrespective of a company's bankruptcy or insolvency under IBC. The key point is that the offence pertains to willful default in filing income tax returns, which is a separate legal matter from the company's financial status or moratorium. 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 3172, 2023 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1085, 2024 0 Supreme(Raj) 617, 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 3360, 2023 0 Supreme(Guj) 815, 2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 24931, 2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 81791, 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 2024, 2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 2236,
SHRI RAMAN KRISHNA KUMAR vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - Madras
Main Points and Insights:
The courts have also held that criminal proceedings under Section 276CC are not automatically quashed due to subsequent assessments or appellate decisions, reaffirming that prosecution can proceed independently of the company's financial status or ongoing insolvency proceedings. 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 3172, 2023 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1085, 2023 0 Supreme(Guj) 815
Analysis and Conclusion:
In the complex interplay between tax compliance and , businesses often grapple with a critical question: Can criminal prosecution under , continue even if a company has filed for bankruptcy under the ? This issue arises frequently when companies facing financial distress delay or fail to file income tax returns, triggering potential criminal liability for .
This blog post delves into and judgments, analyzing the independence of tax prosecutions from insolvency proceedings. While no single ruling in the core documents explicitly addresses IBC 's impact, judicial principles and additional case law consistently affirm that such criminal actions typically proceed unaffected. Note: This is general information, not legal advice. Consult a qualified professional for your specific situation.
Section 276CC penalizes the wilful failure to furnish income tax returns under Section 139(1) or in response to notices under Sections 142(1) or 148. The offence hinges on —a culpable mental state presumed unless rebutted by the accused. 2014 0 Supreme(SC) 75
Key elements include:- : Mere delay isn't enough; intent must be proven, but the burden shifts to the after initial evidence. 2014 0 Supreme(SC) 75- Independence from assessments: The offence completes upon non-filing, unrelated to tax liability determination.
As observed in judicial precedents, Section 276-CC contemplates that an offence is committed on the non-filing of the return and it is totally unrelated to the pendency of .
2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 128
Courts have repeatedly held that Section 276CC prosecutions stand apart from assessment, appeals, or rectification processes. Pendency of appeals does not automatically stay criminal cases.
2025 0 Supreme(SC) 276
For instance:- Prosecution initiates based on non-filing alone, not outcome of assessments. 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 128- Belated filings under Section 139(4) do not erase if delay was deliberate. 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 3172 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 2024
This separation ensures tax enforcement integrity, preventing defaults from evading scrutiny via parallel civil disputes.
The IBC's Section 14 halts civil suits and recovery actions against the during . However, it does not blanket criminal prosecutions. Additional sources clarify:
Courts affirm: The initiation of criminal prosecution is permissible even if the company is under or under IBC. 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 3172 2023 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1085 2024 0 Supreme(Raj) 617
No core document explicitly bars prosecution due to IBC filing. Instead, principles suggest continuation unless a court specifically stays it.
For example, even post-seizure or penalty drops, criminal cases under 276CC proceed if wilfulness is established. 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 1324
2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 128
While prosecutions generally continue:- Judicial discretion: Courts may stay cases on merits, but IBC alone isn't grounds. 2019 0 Supreme(Del) 1559- requirement: Accused can rebut presumption; subsequent refunds or dropped penalties aid defense but don't auto-quash. 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 1324 2024 0 Supreme(Raj) 617- No automatic bar: Criminal proceedings under Section 276CC are not automatically due to subsequent assessments or appellate decisions. 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 3172 2023 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1085
In practice:- Companies under CIRP should proactively seek stays if applicable.- Directors/officers remain liable under .
Extended precedents reinforce: The has consistently held that criminal proceedings under Section 276CC... can be initiated and continued irrespective of a company's bankruptcy or insolvency under IBC. 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 3172 2023 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1085 2024 0 Supreme(Raj) 617 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 3360
This stance upholds tax compliance amid insolvency, balancing creditor rehabilitation with revenue protection.
In conclusion, while awaiting any definitive pronouncement on IBC's interplay with Section 276CC, prevailing law indicates criminal prosecutions may continue during . This underscores the primacy of tax compliance. For updates, monitor / and rulings.
References (select excerpts):- 2014 0 Supreme(SC) 75,
, 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 128, 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 3172, 2023 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1085, 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 588, 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 1324
Word count: 1028. This analysis draws from judicial documents for informational purposes only.
#Section276CC, #IBCMoratorium, #IncomeTaxProsecution
Section 276CC - Income Tax Offence - 276CC of Income Tax Act - The court discussed the provisions of Section ... Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner's actions constituted an offence under Section 276CC of ... 276CC of the Income Tax Act. ... Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax reported in 2014 (5) SCC 139, wherein it is held....
Income Tax - Criminal Proceeding - Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 276CC, Section 278B p align="justify ... Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the prosecution under section 276CC is not sustainable when the tax has ... 276CC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. ... 276CC read with Section 278B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 an....
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that for a conviction under Section 276CC, the prosecution must establish ... 276CC of the Income Tax Act. ... 276CC of the Income Tax Act. ... The sole case of the prosecution is that the respondent has failed to comply with the provisions contained under Section 139(1) of the Act of 1961 and he has submitted the income#....
Commissioner of Income Tax (Supra), the Hon’ble Apex Court, reading Section 276CC with Section 139 of the Income Tax Act has explained significance of the term ‘in due time’, used in Section 276CC, and in case of Sasi Enterprises v. ... Income Tax Officer, 1998 SC....
CRIMINAL LAW - INCOME TAX OFFENCE - Section 276CC, Section 139, Section 153A, Section 271F - The court discussed ... the provisions of Section 276CC of the Income Tax Act, which penalizes willful failure to file income tax returns, and Section 139 ... The court interpreted that the failure to file returns within the stipulated time constitutes an offence under Section 276CC, emphasizing ....
As per terms of Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, moratorium as envisaged under provisions of Section 14(1). Further already the Company is under liquidation and it is not functioning. ... Therefore, they wilfully and deliberately committed default in filing the returns of income within the due time, which is an offence punishable under Section #HL_....
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax reported in 2014 (5) SCC 139 wherein it is held that Section 276CC of the Income Tax Act is attracted once is a failure there to file the return. ... The trial court had taken cognizance without application of mind and it is against the provisions under Section 153A and #HL_START....
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the interpretation of 'in due time' under Section 276CC, the relevance of Section 139 ... 276CC. ... the provisions of Section 139(1) and Section 139(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the interpretation of 'in due time' under Section ... The Income Tax Department filed a criminal complaint against the petitioner ....
139[1] of the Income Tax Act, 1961. ... under Section 276CC of the Act, 1961. ... Commissioner of Income Tax], wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court examined Section 276CC read with 139 Supreme Court that in a prosec....
The learned Special Public Prosecutor also relied on the judgment reported in 2004 [135] Taxman 327 [SC] [Prakash Nath Khanna V. Commissioner of Income Tax], wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court examined Section 276CC read with 139 of the Act, 1961 and held as follows:- “18. ... We have indicated that on failure to file the returns by t....
(ix) The IBC must prevail over Section 138/141 of the N.I. Act, 1881, for the want of the non-obstante provision of Section 238. Further, it will override anything inconsistent contained in any other enactment, including the Income-Tax Act, 1961. Reference can be in this connection made to Dena Bank vs. Bhikhabhai Prabhudas Parekh and Co. & Ors., (2000) 5 SCC 694, which made it clear that income-tax dues, being in the nature of Crown debts, do not take precedence even over secured creditors, w....
3. Learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the revised income tax return was filed belatedly as the concerned records were seized in pursuance to the seizure. Ultimately, the penalty proceedings under the IT Act, 1961 were dropped, and in fact refund has been ordered. 1. Leave granted. 2. The appeal lies on a very narrow compass. The criminal proceedings have been initiated under Section 276CC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the IT Act, 1961....
Further, at the stage, the proceedings under 148 of the Act, 1961 had not crystallized. 30. Corporate Insolvency Resolution Plan approved under Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) did not contemplate tax dues under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
It is also stated that the Company Petition filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 before the National Company Law Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (Adjudicating Authority) and a Moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) was declared by the Adjudicating Authority Prohibiting/Barring institution of the suits against the Defendant/Respondent. It is further stated that the suit has been filed on 28.11.2017. On 28....
It was in this background that the Court had held that criminal proceedings could continue despite a moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC. The said judgment would have no application in the present case as in this case, there are no criminal proceedings and what is filed before this Court is a petition under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India and is in the nature of civil contempt. A bare reading of the judgm....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
