Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Checking relevance for PARAMVIR SINGH SAINI VS BALJIT SINGH...
Checking relevance for Chandrabhan Sudam Sanap VS State of Maharashtra...
Checking relevance for Dashwanth VS State of Tamil Nadu...
Checking relevance for Naresh @ Nehru VS State Of Haryana...
Checking relevance for P. Gopalkrishnan @ Dileep VS State of Kerala...
Checking relevance for Sanjeev Bishnudev Mishra VS State of Maharashtra...
Checking relevance for Freed VS State of H. P. ...
Checking relevance for Kaushal VS State Of Haryana...
2022 0 Supreme(P&H) 1290 : The Supreme Court in Paramvir Singh Saini v. Baljit Singh and others (2021) 1 SCC 184 directed that CCTV camera footage in police stations must be preserved for a period of 18 months, with a mandatory minimum storage period of one year if the equipment available cannot support 18 months. The Court emphasized that it is mandatory for all States, Union Territories, and the Central Government to purchase recording equipment capable of storing footage for at least one year, and to ensure that the best available equipment is used. This directive applies to all police stations and mandates the preservation of footage for at least one year from the date of recording.Checking relevance for Kaushal VS State Of Haryana...
2022 0 Supreme(P&H) 1284 : The Supreme Court, in the case of Paramvir Singh Saini v. Baljit Singh and others (2021) 1 SCC 184, directed that CCTV camera footage in police stations must be preserved for a period of 18 months. However, if the available recording equipment cannot store footage for 18 months, it shall be mandatory for all States, Union Territories, and the Central Government to purchase equipment that allows storage for the maximum period possible, and in any case, not below 1 year. This means that production of CCTV footage from a police station within one year is mandatory when requested, as the minimum storage period is set at one year.Checking relevance for Propertymen Realty Pvt. Ltd. VS State of Jharkhand...
2023 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1133 : CCTV footage from police stations must be preserved for a minimum period of six months, and in cases involving human rights violations, the victim has a right to have the footage secured. While the document mandates a storage period of 18 months for CCTV footage in general, it specifies that the minimum preservation period for police stations is six months. However, it also states that if recording equipment cannot store footage for 18 months, the minimum storage period must be at least one year. Therefore, production of CCTV footage from a police station within one year is mandatory when requested, particularly in cases of human rights violations.Checking relevance for Somnath Laxman Giri VS State Of Maharashtra...
2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 1143 : The Supreme Court order mandates that CCTV footage in police stations must be preserved for a minimum period of 18 months, with a mandatory minimum storage period of 1 year if the equipment available cannot support 18 months. The order also states that it is mandatory for States, Union Territories, and the Central Government to purchase recording equipment capable of storing footage for the maximum period possible, and in any case, not below 1 year. This establishes that the production of CCTV footage from a police station within one year is not only permitted but is legally required under the Supreme Court''''s directive, especially in cases involving human rights violations.Checking relevance for Mohd. Quadeer VS Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad...
Checking relevance for TOMASO BRUNO VS STATE OF U. P. ...
Checking relevance for Dilip K. Basu VS State of West Bengal...
2015 0 Supreme(SC) 1014 : The court directed that CCTV footage from police stations should be produced expeditiously and as far as possible within a period of one year from the date of the order, in the context of preventing human rights violations and ensuring accountability in custodial settings.
