Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Site Plan Discrepancies - Multiple cases show that the site plan often does not match the actual place of incident as described by witnesses. For example, in sources 2023 0 Supreme(Del) 52, 2024 0 Supreme(All) 1527, 2022 0 Supreme(All) 1056, and 2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 372, witnesses' statements about the incident location conflict with the site plan details, such as the incident not occurring on the road indicated or in the place pointed out by witnesses. reference: 2023 0 Supreme(Del) 52, 2024 0 Supreme(All) 1527, 2022 0 Supreme(All) 1056, 2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 372
Witness Testimony vs. Site Plan - Witnesses frequently provide inconsistent or contradictory accounts regarding the incident location compared to the site plan. For instance, PW-4 and PW-7's statements about the incident location differ from the site plan in 2023 0 Supreme(Del) 52, and similar discrepancies are noted in 2022 0 Supreme(All) 1056 and 2024 0 Supreme(All) 2526. reference: 2023 0 Supreme(Del) 52, 2022 0 Supreme(All) 1056, 2024 0 Supreme(All) 2526
Site Plan Prepared at Witness or Investigating Officer's Instance - Several cases reveal that site plans were allegedly prepared at the instance of witnesses or police officers, but the accuracy and impartiality are questioned. For example, in 2024 0 Supreme(All) 1527, the site plan was prepared without PW-2's assistance, and its details are challenged. Similarly, in 2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 374, the site plan was not prepared at the instance of the complainant, raising doubts about its authenticity.
Place of Incident and Accused's Location - In some cases, the site plan shows the accused at different locations than described in the FIR or witnesses' statements. For example, in 2024 0 Supreme(All) 1495, the site plan indicates the incident occurred in front of Bright Rajshahi Public School, whereas the FIR states it was in front of Power-loom factory, leading to disputes about the true location.
Accused Acquittal Despite Disputed Site Plan - Courts have acquitted accused where the site plan was found unreliable or inconsistent with witness testimonies. In 2024 Supreme(Online)(HP) 10160, despite discrepancies, the court relied on photographs and eyewitnesses rather than the site plan, leading to the accused's acquittal.
Analysis and Conclusion:These sources collectively illustrate that discrepancies between site plans and witness testimonies are common in these cases. Courts have sometimes relied on physical evidence or eyewitness accounts over flawed or disputed site plans, leading to acquittals. In particular, the Posco cases, which involved disputes over the exact location of incidents, show that when the site plan shows a different place than the witnesses' descriptions, courts tend to favor the latter, resulting in acquittals of the accused due to lack of reliable evidence linking them to the specific incident location.
In cases, the reliability of evidence is paramount, especially when dealing with vulnerable child victims. A common point of contention arises when the —a sketch prepared by depicting the scene of the crime—conflicts with or shows a different . This raises critical questions: Can such discrepancies alone lead to the ?
Many defendants in POCSO trials challenge the prosecution's case by highlighting these inconsistencies. For instance, a frequently asked legal query is: Find a Judgement in which Disputed and Shows Different and Accused was Acquittal in Posco Cases where . This article delves into relevant Indian court judgments, analyzing how courts handle disputes in POCSO and similar cases, often resulting in acquittals when evidence falters.
A is a crucial document in criminal cases, intended to visually represent the , positions of the accused, victim, and witnesses. However, courts have repeatedly noted its limitations. As observed in one judgment, A is prepared on the basis of information given by witnesses. A only gives a general idea and is not a true to scale map.2018 5 Supreme 453
Despite this, when the depicts a different place than described in the or by witnesses, it can create . In POCSO cases, where precision in proving the incident's occurrence is vital, such mismatches often tip the scales toward acquittal.
These issues frequently undermine the prosecution, leading courts to acquit.
Several cases illustrate how discrepancies showing a different resulted in accused acquittal, particularly in POCSO contexts.
In this case, the court acquitted the accused despite other evidence, prioritizing photographs and eyewitnesses over a flawed . The discrepancies were deemed significant enough to question the overall narrative, highlighting that unreliable site plans can be fatal to the prosecution. 2024 Supreme(Online)(HP) 10160
Courts in these matters favored physical evidence or consistent testimonies over disputed plans, often acquitting due to lack of reliable location proof.
Not all issues result in acquittal. Courts typically overlook minor variations if remain consistent.
In POCSO cases, courts emphasize that should not overshadow core evidence, but substantial contradictions—like a wholly different incident place—can lead to acquittal.
Additional sources reveal patterns:
Analysis: While consistent medical evidence (e.g., injuries matching testimonies) can salvage cases, a showing a different place often creates irreconcilable doubt in POCSO trials, favoring acquittal. 2016 0 Supreme(All) 776 2015 0 Supreme(All) 800
In POCSO, courts urge focusing on child victim's credible account over technical flaws, but persistent location disputes have led to acquittals.
Disputed site plans showing a different have indeed led to accused acquittals in POCSO cases, as seen in 2024 Supreme(Online)(HP) 10160, 2023 0 Supreme(Del) 52, and others. While courts like those in 2018 5 Supreme 453 and 2020 0 Supreme(All) 556 caution against over-relying on minor issues, substantial conflicts prioritize doubt in favor of the accused. This underscores the need for meticulous investigations in child sexual abuse trials.
This article provides general insights based on judgments and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for case-specific guidance.
between 7-7:30 AM, and further the site-plan shows the incident spot is not on the road mentioned by PW-7. ... However in the court, he stated that the car had merely overtaken him; (3) PW-4 stated that when the alleged incident took place he was going from South to North, whereas the site-plan shows the incident poi....
He has further submitted that PW-2 since had never arrived, his assistance was not taken while the site plan was being prepared. In the site plan neither the place from where the firing had taken place nor the place from where the blood-stained soil had been taken into custody was shown. ... The argument of the learned counsel for the first informant that the ....
This shows contradictory statement of the prosecutrix. Whether the place of occurrence is karkhana or the house of accused becomes doubtful as per the site plan itself. In the site plan, karkhana has not been shown. P.W.4 has not visited the place of occurrence, i.e. karkhana. ... P.W.4 further stated that he inspected the place of oc....
out of the prosecutrix and prepared the site plan. ... In the present case we find that there are at least 5 witnesses whose presence at the place of the incident and whose having seen the/span
does not show the presence of cycles or the bushes although the site plan mentions the place wherefrom the two witnesses claim to have seen the incident.” ... A site plan of the place of occurrence of an incident shall be appended by the Investigating Officer to the scene mahazar or spot panchnama. ii. ... State of M.P., (2003) 9 SCC 45 it has been hel....
of incident between 7-7:30 AM, and further the site-plan shows the incident spot is not on the road mentioned by PW-7. ... However in the court, he stated that the car had merely overtaken him; (3) PW-4 stated that when the alleged incident took place he was going from South to North, whereas the site-plan shows ....
The site plan (Ext. PW8/B) shows the place of accident as the point ‘A’. 15 feet space is shown towards the left side of the truck and 5 feet space is shown towards the right side of the truck. ... The place of incident is shown to be about 20 feet wide. The photograph shows the truck towards its extreme lefthand side. The fact that the accident had taken plac....
We further find that the case of the first informant was that the first informant and his uncle/deceased reached the place of incident around 1-1/2 hours prior to the time of incident but the attack actually took place at 8.00 a.m.. ... at the place of incident. ... He has thereafter stated that along the boundary of the agricultural field, which runs from east to west,....
However, Ex.PW-1/H is the site plan of the alleged place of recovery of the alleged weapon of offence at the instance of the accused. During the examination-in- chief, PW-1 did not even point at the site plan which was prepared at his instance. ... Thereafter, PW-1 deposed that he had shown the place of occurrence to the police and the site #HL_ST....
The site plan shows that the accused-appellant was standing with knife and committed murder of the deceased Mohd. Raees Ahmad in front of Bright Rajshahi Public School. ... It means as per the site plan, the place of occurrence of the incident was Bright Rajshahi Public School, but as per the FIR version, the place of occurrence of th....
It has also relied on discovery of weapon, i.e. knife on the information given by accused-appellant in custody and said knife in forensic examination was found to have stains of human blood. PW-2 being son of PW-1 was well acquainted with Manveer and, therefore, could have easily identify him even when incident took place in the late evening in winter season, i.e., around 6.00 PM. Site plan also shows that shop of Lala was near the place of incident.
A report has also been obtained from Forensic Science Laboratory, Lucknow, dated 18.08.2007 wherein forensic expert has confirmed fact that the country made gun which was marked 1/2007 is stated to have been used in the commission of the offence. The site plan of the incident is also proved which also shows that the incident was caused while the injured was sitting in Verandah and the place where the accused-appellant was standing and from where he fired on the injured has been marke....
When he came to know that the assailants were present at Mahua Bari or in its neighbourhood then he left Mahua Bari with police persons, they reached at that place. The assailants were taken into custody, who were father and sons respectively. The Constable Ram Awadh Mishra was directed to take them P.H.C. for medical examination and medical aid. Investigating Officer prepared site plan, where incident took place.
4. Bloodstained and plain soil was taken from the place of occurrence and its memo was prepared. Place of incident was inspected and site plan was prepared. After completing the investigation, charge-sheet was filed against the appellant.
The time of the firing is 11:00 PM i.e. a time when it is pitch dark. The site plan Ex.PW-12/A shows no light whatsoever in the area where the incident took place. Secondly, as stated by Const.L.H.Farnandes he was sleeping when he heard a noise.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
