Mere Presence/Availability of a Product - The existence or availability of a medicinal product or mark alone is insufficient to establish legal infringement; even a slight probability of confusion necessitates restraint on use. Internet testing or online presence does not automatically satisfy legal standards for infringement or confusion. ["2024 0 Supreme(Bom) 447"]
Mere Purchase or Possession of Medicinal Kits - The act of merely purchasing or possessing medicinal kits (e.g., MTP kits) without evidence of illegal intent or further involvement does not constitute an offence. ["2023 0 Supreme(P&H) 833"]
Legal Recognition and Qualification of Medical Practitioners - The term person recognized at law as a practitioner applies to qualified medical practitioners, emphasizing that only duly qualified individuals are recognized legally as practitioners in medicine or surgery. Mere recognition or status without proper qualification is insufficient. ["
AMERASEKERA v. LEBBE
"]Marketing and Criminal Liability - Simply marketing a product or service is not inherently a crime; the distinction between legitimate marketing and marketing for kickbacks is crucial. Statements indicating that compensation following purchases does not automatically imply criminal activity, and such misstatements are often considered harmless. ["2025 Supreme(US)(ca5) 198"]
Mere Possession or Distribution Without Commercial Element - Possession or distribution of medicinal substances without a commercial intent does not attract penal provisions. The act must involve a commercial element to be considered an offence. ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 8495"]
Liability of Company Directors - A director's liability requires specific allegations regarding their role in management; mere designation as a director without details of involvement does not establish liability. Directors in charge of daily affairs may be vicariously liable, but general statements are insufficient. ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 35606"]
Product Classification Based on Ingredients and Use - A product's classification (e.g., as a medicated or cosmetic powder) depends on its ingredients and intended use. The addition of medicated to a powder indicates therapeutic or prophylactic properties, differentiating it from purely cosmetic products. ["2023 0 Supreme(SC) 479"]
Therapeutic Properties of Ingredients - Ingredients with antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and healing properties expand a product's classification beyond mere antiseptic use, indicating multiple therapeutic benefits. The legislative context considers the condition of machinery or ingredients relevant to product classification and legal interpretation. ["2024 0 Supreme(All) 1483"]
Analysis and Conclusion:The sources collectively emphasize that mere presence, possession, or marketing of medicinal or cosmetic products does not automatically imply legal infringement or criminal liability. Critical factors include the intent, qualification of practitioners, the presence of a commercial element, and the specific use or ingredients of a product. Legal distinctions hinge on nuances such as the nature of the product, its classification, and the involvement of qualified professionals or commercial motives. Therefore, understanding the context and specific details is essential in assessing legal issues related to medicines and related products.
References:- 2024 0 Supreme(Bom) 447-
CASIE CHETTY v. AHAMADU
- 2023 0 Supreme(P&H) 833-Dow Chemical International Pvt. Ltd. VS Commissioner of Customs NS-II Special Investigation and Intelligence Branch (X) - Bombay (2024)
- 2025 Supreme(US)(ca5) 198-AMERASEKERA v. LEBBE
- INDEL00000151996- INKAR00000163532- 2023 0 Supreme(SC) 479- 2024 0 Supreme(All) 1483